http://ats2020.donau-uni.ac.at/ats2020wiki/index.php?title=ASSESSMENT&feed=atom&action=historyASSESSMENT - Revision history2024-03-28T16:30:01ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.28.2http://ats2020.donau-uni.ac.at/ats2020wiki/index.php?title=ASSESSMENT&diff=33&oldid=prevIgrundschober: Created page with "ASSESSMENT ===Pattern Origin=== This pattern is based on pattern 35: BEURTEILEN in "Schaufenster des Lernens" and was adapted for the ATS2020 Pattern..."2017-05-30T14:54:31Z<p>Created page with "<a href="/ats2020wiki/index.php?title=Datei:Dateiname&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Datei:Dateiname (page does not exist)">mini|ASSESSMENT</a> ===Pattern Origin=== This pattern is based on pattern 35: BEURTEILEN in "Schaufenster des Lernens" and was adapted for the ATS2020 Pattern..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>[[Datei:Dateiname|mini|ASSESSMENT]]<br />
<br />
===Pattern Origin===<br />
This pattern is based on pattern 35: BEURTEILEN in "Schaufenster des Lernens" and was adapted for the ATS2020 Pattern Wiki.<br />
<br />
===Context===<br />
You are teaching in class with a focus not only on the subject area, but also on [[SUPPORTING TRANSVERSAL SKILLS]]. You are using the [[EPORTFOLIO]] approach and students document their learning process continuously, similar to an online learning journal.You are at the end of a learning cycle and want to check if the student has reached all pre-defined learning outcomes. <br />
<br />
===Problem===<br />
Like stated by Vygotskii, learning is happening through social interactions.<ref>Vygotskii, L. (1978). Interaktion between learning and development. In: Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA. p.90</ref> [[SELF-ASSESSMENT]] and reflection are very useful, but not enough if you want to support the student's learning process. <br />
<br />
===Solution===<br />
Give constructive [[FEEDBACK]] to the student's learning documentation and encourage meaningful peer-[[FEEDBACK]] among students. The feedback should be differentiated and could be given to a single artifact or to the whole [[EPORTFOLIO]]. <br />
<br />
===Details===<br />
A prerequisite for giving and receiving good [[FEEDBACK]] is a common quality standard, which should be defined together at the start of the learning cycle. Based on the quality criteria a more objective and distinctive feedback can be given. The [[FEEDBACK]] should always start with a positive aspect, like described in the pattern [[FEEDBACK SANDWICH]]. Feedback could be given in an either written or spoken form.<br />
<br />
===Examples===<br />
A teacher from Lithuania used [[FEEDBACK]] in class through connecting students within the social network yammer. After an instruction stating quality standards, students produced their own podcasts and posted the restults on yammer. The students and put on headphones, listened to their classmates' podcasts and commented on it and/or clicked the "like"-Button. Read and see more about the ePortfolio learning scenario and its [[FEEDBACK]]-activities [https://eufolioresources.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/lt_ls_1_exemplar-lith.pdf/ here].<br />
<br />
=Related Patterns=<br />
<br />
*[[FEEDBACK SANDWICH]]<br />
*[[ASSESSMENT]]<br />
*[[APPRECIATING]]<br />
*[[RECOGNIZING]]<br />
*[[SELF-ASSESSMENT]]<br />
<br />
'''References:'''<br />
<references /></div>Igrundschober